Playing to win or playing it safe? Personally, I'd rather take a risk playing for a win than playing not to lose. Coincidentally, yesterday's issue of The Chessville Weekly put it this way, quoting Jean Claude Killy: "To win, you have to risk loss."
My ICC tournament game from today could not be a better example of this philosophy - although I lost the game by taking some risks I almost won. In fact, I missed a forced mate in four after 24. Qxf3 (see diagram). I'll take consolation in the fact I can partially blame time troubles for that as I had 40 seconds left on my clock and just didn't have enough time to confirm and work out the combination. Ah, the joys and sorrows of chess.
Although it is depressing to lose a game, I'm rather proud of the attempt I made to win -sacrificing both a Bishop and a Knight to try and make it happen... and it almost did happen as the following game will show.
After 24. Qxf3 - Black to mate in four:
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Chess as Played in the Real World - No. 8: Playing to Win
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
That was a tough one to lose because though it may be shown to be unsound by the computer, it must have been fun to play those sacs! Long time reader of your blog - hang in there and hope that next game you'll convert the combo into a full point.
Post a Comment